Doe
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03310-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: UBER’S RENEWED
v. MOTION TO STAY
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 206 Defendants.
13 Jane Doe brings a negligence claim against Uber and its wholly owned subsidiaries Rasier, LLC and Rasier CA, LLC (collectively “Uber”) arising from an assault by a former Uber driver posing as a current Uber driver. Uber’s renewed motion to stay pending a decision by the California Court of Appeals in Jane Doe Nos. 1-3 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., No. B310131, is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 206.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the May 12, 2022 hearing, and GRANTS IN PART the motion to stay. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to…