Fuapau

Fuapau v. LHOIST North America of Arizona, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20225:20-cv-04404California1,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SIONE FUAPAU, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04404-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY

v. APPROVAL OF CLASS AND

REPRESENTATIVE ACTION

LHOIST NORTH AMERICA OF SETTLEMENT

ARIZONA, INC.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 51, 59 Defendant.

13 Plaintiffs Sione Fuapau, Alfredo Godinez, Gabriel Mendoza, Manual Vaca, Michael Nau, Antonio Guzman, Jesus Guerrero, Ivan Pacheco, and Miguel Reyes, Jr. filed this state law wage- and-hour action for themselves and on behalf of others similarly situated against their employer, defendant Lhoist North America of Arizona, Inc. (“Lhoist”). Dkt. No. 43. The parties agreed to a settlement, and plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of that settlement, which Lhoist did not oppose. Dkt. Nos. 51, 53. After hearing oral argument on plaintiffs’ motion on March 1, 2022, the Court denied the motion without prejudice on March 21, 2022, citing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.