M.L.A.

M.L.A. v. Maisels

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20225:21-cv-08121California2,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 M. L. A., Case No. 21-cv-08121-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

M. JEFFREY MAISELS, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff M.L.A., a minor, by and through his guardian at litem, asserts a single claim for negligent undertaking against defendant M. Jeffrey Maisels, M.D. Dkt. No. 27. The action was removed from state court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a),2 and Dr. Maisels moved to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. Nos. 1, 10. The Court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 25. Plaintiff amended his complaint for the second time, and defendant again moves to dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 27, 28. The Court heard oral argument on the motion on March 22, 2022. Dkt. No. 34. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.