Khan

Khan v. Payton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20225:20-cv-03086California1,704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN,

Case No. 20-cv-03086 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING NON- v. COGNIZABLE CLAIMS; OF SERVICE AND SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE; DIRECTING

M. PAYTON, DEFENDANTS TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE

Defendant. REGARDING SUCH MOTION;

INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 19 1983 against an officer at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). Dkt. No. 1. The Court 20 screened the amended complaint and granted leave to amend an equal protection claim. 21 Dkt. No. 22. In the alternative, Plaintiff was advised that he may file notice to proceed 22 solely on the cognizable claims identified in the order. Id. at 8. Plaintiff was granted two 23 extensions of time to file a second amended complaint, giving him until May 2, 2022. Dkt. 24 Nos. 28, 32. Plaintiff was advised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.