Kifle

Kifle v. Youtube LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20223:21-cv-01752California1,742 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ELIAS KIFLE, Case No. 21-cv-01752-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

YOUTUBE LLC, et al., Defendants.

Pro se Plaintiff Elias Kifle is suing Defendants YouTube and Does 1–19 for contributory trademark infringement. Fifth Am. Compl. (5AC) (dkt. 82-1). Kifle alleges that YouTube knowingly continued service to users who infringed Kifle’s trademark. Id. ¶ 7. The Court dismissed Kifle’s last complaint with leave to amend this claim. See Order Dismissing 4AC (dkt. 81). Because Kifle fails to cure the deficiencies previously noted, the Court GRANTS the motion with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Kifle alleges that YouTube contributed to trademark infringement of two protectable marks in his videos. 5AC ¶ 7. Kifle alleges that he “exclusively owns the trademarks ‘Mereja TV’ and ‘ነጭ ነጯን ከዘመዴጋር,’” which are “clearly displayed on all his works and throughout his website, Mereja.tv” and “are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.