Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WINSTON R. ANDERSON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04618-VC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT

POLICY COMMITTEE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 163 Defendants.

The only cause of action remaining in this case is Anderson’s claim that the Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee violated ERISA by failing to timely provide documents upon his request. See Dkt. No. 147 (dismissing Counts I–VI). ERISA mandates that the administrator of an employee benefit plan “shall, upon written request of any participant or beneficiary, furnish” certain plan documents. 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4). Under ERISA section 502(c)(1), where an administrator “fails or refuses to comply” with such a request within 30 days, the administrator “may in the court’s discretion be personally liable to such participant or beneficiary in the amount of up to $100 a day from the date of such failure or refusal, and the court may in its discretion order such other relief as it deems proper.” 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c)(1). Anderson first sent a letter to the Committee…