I.

I. v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20223:20-cv-05811California6,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 K. I., Case No. 20-cv-05811-JSC

Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER RE: CROSS-

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 25 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff seeks Social Security benefits for physical and mental impairments including a gun shot to the spine, depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder.1 (Administrative Record (“AR”) 234, 276.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying his benefits claim. After carefully considering the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, (Dkt. Nos. 17, 25), the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and REMANDS for further proceedings. Because the ALJ erred in her evaluation of the medical evidence and rejection of Plaintiff’s subjective symptom testimony, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.