Bumpus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SARAH BUMPUS, et al., individually and Case No. 3:19-cv-03309-JD on behalf of all similarly situated persons, 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT MOTIONS v.

REALOGY BROKERAGE GROUP LLC

(F/K/A NRT LLC), et al., Defendants.

13 In this class action, named plaintiffs Sarah Bumpus, Micheline Peker, and Cheryl Rowan, have alleged claims against defendant Realogy under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The Court certified three classes under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3). Dkt. No. 223. Plaintiffs ask for summary judgment in their favor. Dkt. No. 198. Realogy asks the same for itself. Dkt. No. 205. The parties’ familiarity with the applicable standards for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and with the record is assumed. All of the summary judgment motions are denied. The reason for the denial is straightforward. As the parties’ own motion papers amply demonstrate, this case is…