Harrison

Harrison v. IFit Health & Fitness

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20224:21-cv-10079California3,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRINA HARRISON, Case No. 21-cv-10079-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

IFIT HEALTH & FITNESS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendants.

13 Defendant iFit, Inc.’s motion to dismiss came on for hearing before this court on April 28, 2022. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeared on her own behalf. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Bradley R. Mathews. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND This is a products liability case involving treadmills purchased for in-home use. Plaintiff Patrina Harrison is an asthma and allergy sufferer who resides in San Francisco. Compl. ¶ 8. Defendant iFit, Inc. (hereafter “iFit,” erroneously sued as IFIT HEALTH & FITNESS, ICON HEALTH &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.