Gamino

Gamino v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20224:19-cv-01880California982 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADRIAN GAMINO, Case No. 19-cv-01880-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

VACATE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 1 USA, Defendant. USA, Case No. 11-cr-00596-HSG-2 Plaintiff, v. Re: Dkt. No. 67 GAMINO, Defendant. USA, Case No. 11-cr-00595-HSG-1 Plaintiff, v. Re: Dkt. No. 36 GAMINO, Defendant. 22 I. BACKGROUND On April 18, 2019, Defendant Adrian Gamino (“Defendant”) filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. See Dkt. No. 36 in 11-CR-00595-HSG-1 and Dkt. No. 67 in 11-CR-00596-HSG-2. Defendant was sentenced to 240-month concurrent sentences in the two cases for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine. See substance offenses in light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Sessions v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.