Bynum

Bynum v. Sweet

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20225:21-cv-05833California1,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIM CARTER BYNUM,

Case No. 21-05833 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO v. ISSUE SUMMONS AND MARSHAL TO SERVE COMPLAINT ON

DEFENDANT MICHAEL LAUFIK;

MARY SWEET, et al., DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR

Defendants. NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

MOTION

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad (“CTF”) where he is currently incarcerated. Dkt. No. 1. On April 29, 2022, Plaintiff was directed to provide the location information for Defendant Dr. Martin Laufik so the Marshal can effect service. Dkt. No. 28. On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff responded with that information. Dkt. No. 31. Accordingly, the Court will order the Marshal to formally serve the matter on Defendant Dr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.