Brown

Clark v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20225:21-cv-09230California317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALPHONSO RAMON CLARK, Case No. 21-cv-09230 BLF (PR) 11 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST

FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL v.

DR. MOLLY BROWN, et al., Defendants. (Docket No. 7)

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On April 5, 2022, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 3. On May 9, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time. Dkt. Nos. 5, 6. On May 13, 2022, Plaintiff filed a single page document with the caption, “Motion to dismiss without prejudice.” Dkt. No. 7. The Court construes this document as a request for voluntary dismissal. A plaintiff has the absolute right to dismiss his or her action by filing a notice of dismissal “at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i). Said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.