New PV NN Ne BN NON oN ee □ “yw it wv!

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -90)

On December 7, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 357 F.Supp.3d 1391 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 197 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of South Carolina. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of South Carolina and assigned to Judge Gergel. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of South Carolina for the reasons stated in the order of December 7, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: covisttted time, the May 18, 2022 Sk □□ RTeD srares MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel Ses Piste A TRUE COPY OY see \D ATTEST: ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK Ask Me x BY: dle, a Shea a AD OR ae” DEPUTY CLERK

IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM−FORMING FOAMS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873

SCHEDULE CTO−90 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 22−02635 Nordby et al v. 3M Company et al CAN 5 22−02629 Nanez et al v. 3M Company et al

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NH 1 22−00145 NH, State of v. 3M Company et al OPPOSED 5/18/22

NEW YORK SOUTHERN

NYS 1 22−03717 Guevara et al v. 3M Company et al