Saddozai

Saddozai v. Carwithen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20225:21-cv-01352California733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIKEB SADDOZAI, Case No. 21-cv-01352 BLF (PR)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION

v. OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

A. CARWITHEN, et al.,

15 Defendants. (Docket No. 42)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), where he is currently confined, and the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Dkt. No. 1. After the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, Dkt. No. 10, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 17. The Court found the amended complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant A. Carwithen for the deprivation of sleep, and dismissed all other claims and defendants from this action. Dkt. No. 20. On February 3, 2022, Defendant filed a motion to revoke…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.