Poorsina

Poorsina v. Tseng

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20223:20-cv-09122California840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

7 ALI R. POORSINA, Case No: 20-cv-09122 SBA 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT vs. 10 TAN TSENG, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Ali R. Poorsina (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against Defendants Tan Tseng (“Tseng”), Terrenz Kukant Cam (“T.K. Cam”), Boi Anh Hong (“Hong”), and Kevin Tu Cam (“K.T. Cam”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The procedural background is set forth in detail in the Order: (1) Granting Motion to Set Aside the Entry of Default; (2) Denying Motion for Default Judgment; and (3) Denying Motion to Consolidate Cases, which issued January 12, 2022 (“Order”). Dkt. 68. As is pertinent here, the Order set aside the entry of default against Tseng, T.K. Cam, and Hong based on ineffective service; default had not been entered against K.T. Cam. Given the lack of effective service, the Order also denied Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against Defendants. The Order directed Plaintiff to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.