Poorsina
Poorsina v. Tseng
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
7 ALI R. POORSINA, Case No: 20-cv-09122 SBA 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT vs. 10 TAN TSENG, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Ali R. Poorsina (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against Defendants Tan Tseng (“Tseng”), Terrenz Kukant Cam (“T.K. Cam”), Boi Anh Hong (“Hong”), and Kevin Tu Cam (“K.T. Cam”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The procedural background is set forth in detail in the Order: (1) Granting Motion to Set Aside the Entry of Default; (2) Denying Motion for Default Judgment; and (3) Denying Motion to Consolidate Cases, which issued January 12, 2022 (“Order”). Dkt. 68. As is pertinent here, the Order set aside the entry of default against Tseng, T.K. Cam, and Hong based on ineffective service; default had not been entered against K.T. Cam. Given the lack of effective service, the Order also denied Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against Defendants. The Order directed Plaintiff to…