Hollis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAVIJAR HOLLIS, Case No. 22-cv-00769-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

CARLOS G. BOLANOS, et al., Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Tavijar Hollis failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice to Hollis moving to reopen and filing an amended complaint after he has exhausted his administrative remedies. STANDARD OF REVIEW A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings…