Greenspan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON JACOB GREENSPAN, Case No. 20-cv-03426-JD

Plaintiff,

SECOND ORDER RE MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

OMAR QAZI, et al., Defendants.

12 In the order that dismissed pro se plaintiff Greenspan’s third amended complaint (TAC), the Court detailed the many ways in which the TAC fell short of plausibly alleging federal securities and copyright claims, among others, against defendants Elon Musk and Tesla, and Omar Qazi and his company, Smick Enterprises, Inc. Dkt. No. 125. Greenspan was given leave to file a fourth amended complaint (FAC), even though he had already filed more than 4,000 pages of pleadings in an original and three amended complaints. Id. at 2, 21. The Court directed Greenspan to amend his allegations in a manner consistent with the order, and limited the FAC to 50 pages. Id. at 21. At Greenspan’s request, the Court increased the limit to 75 pages. Dkt. No. 130 at 3. The FAC Greenspan filed, Dkt. No. 131, complied with this…