Khan

Khan v. Payton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20225:20-cv-03086California741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Case No. 20-cv-03086 BLF (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING ORDER

DISMISSING NON-COGNIZABLE

v. CLAIMS AND BRIEFING

SCHEDULE; GRANTING MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

M. PAYTON, FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT Defendant. (Docket No. 34)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against an officer at San Quentin State Prison. Dkt. No. 1. On June 14, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted leave to amend an equal protection claim. Dkt. No. 22. In the alternative, Plaintiff was advised that he may file notice to proceed solely on the cognizable claims identified in the order. Id. at 8. Plaintiff failed to file a second amended complaint after being granted three extensions of time. Dkt. Nos. 25,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.