Kaiser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NECTALI ULISES ROMERO ROMERO, Case No. 22-cv-02508-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

POLLY KAISER, et al., Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION On May 6, 2022, the Court granted Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and ordered Respondents to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. ECF No. 20. On May 13, 2022, Respondents filed a response to the Court’s order. ECF No. 22. On May 17, 2022, Petitioner filed a reply. ECF No. 23. The Court determines this matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ papers and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS a preliminary injunction for the reasons stated below.1 II. BACKGROUND The Court described in detail the factual background of this case in the Court’s Order Granting TRO. See ECF No. 20 at 1-2. …