Austin v. ABC Legal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-09076-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
ABC LEGAL, JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 64,
17 Two motions are before the Court. First, a motion to dismiss (or in the alternative, for a more definite statement) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 8(a) filed by defendant ABC Legal. Dkt. No. 61. Second, a motion for judgment as a matter of law filed by plaintiff George Jarvis Austin. Dkt. No. 64. Oral argument for the dismissal motion was scheduled for May 13, 2022; this Court determined that the matter could be resolved on the papers alone and thus vacated the hearing pursuant to Civ. L-R 7-1(b). Dkt. No. 73. The Court similarly concludes plaintiff’s motion for judgment as a matter of law may be determined without oral argument and so DENIES plaintiff’s …