Scott

Scott v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20224:19-cv-06046California7,979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONNIE SCOTT, Case No. 19-cv-06046-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; REFERRING CASE TO

ERIC GOLDING, et al., SETTLEMENT; STAYING ACTION Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61,

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Folsom State Prison, has filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) doctor D. Kumar and nurse E. Golding were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendant Kumar has filed a summary judgment motion, Dkt. No. 62; Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 66; and defendant Kumar has filed a reply, Dkt. No. 68. Defendant Golding has filed a summary judgment motion, Dkt. No. 61; Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 65; and defendant Golding has filed a reply, Dkt. No. 687. For the reasons set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.