Nordin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON NICHOLAS NORDIN, Case No. 3:21-cv-04717-JD Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. STUART JEREMIAH SCOTT, et al., ll Defendants.

The Court dismissed the original complaint on a variety of grounds. Dkt. No. 17. Pro se || plaintiff Nordin was advised that he could file an amended complaint that was consistent with the order. Id. at 3. The amended complaint, Dkt. No. 24, is substantively indistinguishable from the a 16 || original, and again does not plausibly allege civil rights claims against the Superior Court judge || who handled Nordin’s family law case, or the private defendants who were said to be involved. It 18 || is dismissed for the same reasons stated in the prior order. Because Nordin has been afforded a full opportunity to amend, and further amendment will 20 || not cure the deficiencies in the allegations, the dismissal is with prejudice. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1124 (9th Cir. 2000). The case is…