McKinney-Drobnis

McKinney-Drobnis v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20223:16-cv-06450California1,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BAERBEL MCKINNEY-DROBNIS, Case No. 16-cv-06450-MMC JOSEPH B. PICCOLA, and CAMILLE BERLESE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION FOR FINAL Plaintiffs, APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 10 v.

MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC,

12 Defendant. 13 Before the Court is plaintiffs' Renewed Motion, filed March 30, 2022, "for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement and Entry of Final Judgment." The matter came on regularly for hearing on May 20, 2022. John J. Nelson and Jeffrey R. Krinsk of Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Baerbel McKinney-Drobnis ("McKinney-Drobnis"), Joseph B. Piccola ("Piccola"), and Camille Berlese ("Berlese"). Luanne Sacks and Mike Scott of The Sacks Law Office, and Kahn Scolnick of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, appeared on behalf of defendant Massage Envy Franchising LLC ("MEF"). Theodore H. Frank of the Center for Class Action Fairness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.