Danko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CATLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Case No. 20-cv-01345-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

AMEND JUDGMENT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 43 DANKO MEREDITH, Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Catlin Insurance Company, Inc’s motion to amend the judgment to include both pre- and post-judgment interest. Dkt. No. 43. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. The parties are familiar with the facts of this case. Catlin filed this action to recover a duplicative settlement payment that it made in connection with an underlying lawsuit in California state court. See Dkt. No. 14 (“FAC”). Following a plane crash in July 2012, Defendant Danko Meredith represented the heirs of one of the decedents, Michael Boolen, in a wrongful death action. See Dkt. No. 36-1 (“Danko Decl.”) at ¶ 2; see also…