Ochoa

Ochoa v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20225:21-cv-02456California2,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 YURIDIA OCHOA, Case No. 21-cv-02456-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

v. YURIDIA OCHOA’S MOTION TO

STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., FROM DEFENDANTS CITY OF SAN

JOSE AND ERIC MOSUNIC’S FIRST

Defendants. AMENDED ANSWERS TO FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND [Re: ECF No. 55]

14 Before the Court is Plaintiff Yuridia Ochoa’s motion to strike affirmative defenses in the First Amended Answers of Defendants City of San Jose (the “City”) and San Jose Police Department (“SJPD”) Officer Eric Mosunic (“Officer Mosunic”) in this civil rights case related to SJPD officer conduct related to Plaintiff’s arrest. Plaintiff brings federal claims under section 1983 and various state law claims, including unreasonable post-arrest medical care, intentional infliction of emotional 20…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.