Mario V. v. Alisal Union School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MARIO V., et al., Case No. 18-cv-00041-BLF
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF
v. SETTLEMENT FOR NAMED MINOR
PLAINTIFFS; AND VACATING
HENRY ARMENTA, JUNE 2, 2022 HEARING Defendant. [Re: ECF 112]
12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Petition for Approval of Settlement for Named Minor Plaintiffs. See Pet., ECF 112. Defendant Henry Armenta has filed a Statement of Non- Opposition. See Def.’s Statement of Non-Opp., ECF 113. The Court finds the Petition suitable for determination without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The June 2, 2022 hearing on the Petition is VACATED. The Petition is GRANTED for the reasons discussed below. After Armenta, a teacher, performed blood sugar testing on students without their parents’ consent, several students and parents filed this putative class action against Armenta and…