Gosain

Gosain v. Berquist Wood McIntosh Seto LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20224:18-cv-06343California1,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division RAJIV GOSAIN, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06343-HSG (LB)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: ECF No. 172 BERGQUIST WOOD MCINTOSH SETO, LLP, et. al. 15 Defendants. 16 The parties continue to dispute the discovery issues that were addressed in a May 6 discovery order: (1) the lack of verified responses to the document requests; (2) the lack of any response to the interrogatories; and (3) the production of files in an undifferentiated Adobe format, not a native-file format. The plaintiffs’ health issues are contributing to the production issues.1 The court held a discovery hearing on May 26, 2022. At the hearing, the plaintiffs’ counsel said that he did not have access to native-file documents. The court thus does not order that production. He also said that he had produced all responsive documents. He still must produce verified responses to the document requests and must do so by June 9, 2022.

1 Joint Letter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.