Moreno
Moreno v. Perez-Pantoja
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL ANTHONY MORENO, Case No. 22-cv-02267-SVK
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF SERVICE
v.
I. PEREZ-PANTOJA, Defendant.
Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint”). Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. For the reasons that follow, the Court orders service on defendant. DISCUSSION A. Legal Standard Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. See…