Barrera

Barrera v. City of Oakland Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20223:22-cv-03094California1,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARTURO OSIEL VALENCIA BARRERA, Case No. 22-cv-03094-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CITY OF OAKLAND POLICE COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DEPARTMENT, et al., DISMISSED 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 3

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera, pro se, applies to proceed in forma pauperis. See dkt. 3. Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Valencia Barrera’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Valencia Barrera brings an equal protection claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants the City of Oakland Police Department and Eric Kim. For the reasons discussed below, Valencia Barrera is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed. Valencia Barrera shall file either an amended complaint or a response to this order no later than June 17, 2022. If he does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.