Quackenbush
Quackenbush v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARY QUACKENBUSH, GHERI
SUELEN, ANNE PELLETTIERI,
No. C 20-05599 WHA MARISSA FEENEY, and CARYN
PRASSE, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
13 Plaintiffs, OMNIBUS ORDER RE MOTIONS
TO SEAL
14 v.
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR
COMPANY, INC., and
HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD.
17 Defendants.
In connection with a motion for class certification, plaintiffs have moved to file under seal certain exhibits and portions of their briefing. Defendants have moved to do the same (Dkt. Nos. 67, 82, 99, 109). Because the underlying motion for class certification was more than tangentially related to the merits of the case, compelling reasons are required to warrant sealing. See Civil L.R. 7-11, 79-5(e); Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 2016); Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006).1 26 Our new Civil Local Rules became effective on November 1, 2021. The class…