Saroya

Saroya v. University of the Pacific

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20225:20-cv-03196California3,703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TRISTAN RANDALL, Case No. 5:20-cv-03196-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, Re: Dkt. No. 75 Defendant.

Plaintiff Tristan Randall alleges on behalf of himself and a putative class that Defendant University of the Pacific (“UOP”) breached a contract with its students, or alternatively, unjustly enriched itself at its students’ expenses when it retained the full amount of tuition and fees it collected for the Spring 2020 semester despite ceasing in-person instruction and closing its campus facilities and resources with just six weeks left of the semester. Currently at issue is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See University of the Pacific Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (“MSJ”), Dkt. No. 75. On February 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendant filed a reply. See Plaintiff Tristan Randall’s Memorandum of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.