Saroya
Saroya v. University of the Pacific
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TRISTAN RANDALL, Case No. 5:20-cv-03196-EJD
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, Re: Dkt. No. 75 Defendant.
Plaintiff Tristan Randall alleges on behalf of himself and a putative class that Defendant University of the Pacific (“UOP”) breached a contract with its students, or alternatively, unjustly enriched itself at its students’ expenses when it retained the full amount of tuition and fees it collected for the Spring 2020 semester despite ceasing in-person instruction and closing its campus facilities and resources with just six weeks left of the semester. Currently at issue is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See University of the Pacific Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (“MSJ”), Dkt. No. 75. On February 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendant filed a reply. See Plaintiff Tristan Randall’s Memorandum of …