PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20224:20-cv-05381California2,460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JH KELLY, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-05381-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 234 Defendant.

12 JH Kelly, LLC (“JH Kelly”) asks the Court for leave to file a motion to reconsider its Order granting AECOM’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Dkt. Nos. 229 (“Order”), 234 (“Mot.”). Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3) allows a party to seek reconsideration of an order if the court manifestly failed to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments. JH Kelly contends that the Court did so when it granted summary judgment on JH Kelly’s claims for labor and material furnished through September 12, 2018. See Order at 10-15. The Court largely disagrees and DENIES JH Kelly’s motion, except for the limited issue identified below. The Court will not repeat the full underlying facts and procedural posture of this motion …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.