Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 22-cv-00919-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

ESTHER GOMEZ, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendants.

13 The court is in receipt of defendants’ request to continue the hearing set for their motion to dismiss. The request is procedurally defective, as it should have been filed as a motion for administrative relief pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11 and it should have been filed further in advance of the hearing date for defendants’ motion. However, considering defense counsel’s trial obligations and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the request. The hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 13) is hereby continued to a future date. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is based on a factual challenge to plaintiff’s standing to pursue injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act. See D’Lil v. Best W. Encina Lodge & Suites, 538 F.3d 1031, 1037 (9th Cir. 2008). In their moving papers,…