Johnson v. Charter Communications, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20224:21-cv-06135California2,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LORETTA JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06135-HSG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC, et Re: Dkt. Nos. 35, 36 al., 11 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants Spectrum Management Holding Company, LLC and Charter Communications, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration. Dkt. No. 35. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background Plaintiff Loretta Johnson alleges that when she called Spectrum in July 2020 to sign up for its cable and internet service, her phone calls were recorded without her consent in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”). Dkt. No. 1-1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 3, 5, 31-37. In July 2021, Johnson brought this putative class action lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court asserting a CIPA claim against Spectrum and its parent company Charter Communications, Inc. (collectively, “Spectrum”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.