Navarro
Navarro v. SmileDirectClub, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARNOLD NAVARRO, Case No. 22-cv-00095-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AND DENYING
SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC., et al., DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO STRIKE
Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 18, Dkt. No.
13 Arnold Navarro, the plaintiff in this putative class action, alleges that SmileDirectClub, 14 Inc., SmileDirectClub, LLC, Jeffrey Sulitzer, and Jeffrey Sulitzer, D.M.D., P.C. (collectively 15 “SDC”), engage in the unauthorized practice of dentistry in violation of California law. SDC has 16 moved to compel arbitration. I previously identified evidentiary deficiencies in SDC’s motion and 17 ordered SDC to file a declaration under oath to address these deficiencies. SDC has done so. 18 Specifically, and in keeping with my order, it has produced sworn declarations and supporting 19 exhibits that demonstrate the design and appearance of the clickwrap agreement on April 23, 2020, 20 the date on which Navarro allegedly assented to the…