Allums

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DENNIS BRUCE ALLUMS, Case No. 22-cv-00976-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMSISAL

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 8 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

11 Defendant.

13 Pro se plaintiff Dennis Allums has alleged one claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against 14 defendant City and County of San Francisco relating to an incident in January 2020. Dkt. No. 1-1 15 at ECF p. 5. Allums says he tried to report a concern about “endangerment of a black child” to an 16 SFPD officer, and that the officer was dismissive and declined to open an investigation. Id. at 17 ECF pp. 5-6. Allums believes this was motivated by discrimination against him as an African 18 American. Id. at ECF p. 6. 19 San Francisco has asked to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 12(b)(6). Dkt. No. 8. Dismissal is granted. 21 As a pro se plaintiff, Allums gets a liberal construction of his complaint and the benefit of 22 any doubts, but he still must satisfy the requirements of Rule 8 and state facts sufficient to allege a 23 plausible claim. Nguyen…