Foster

Foster v. Crosby

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20223:22-cv-00878California1,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL BARKARRI FOSTER, Case No. 22-cv-00878-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING THE

v. COMPLAINT IN PART WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

C. CROSBY, et al.,

Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael Barkarri Foster’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint states a claim against only one of 15 defendants. He may file an amended complaint on or before July 11, 2022 that alleges facts to tie the other 14 defendants to any alleged wrongdoing. Failure to file a proper amended complaint by July 11, 2022, or a failure to comply in every respect with the instructions given in this order, may result in the dismissal of those defendants. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.