Ayres

Ayres v. Metlife, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20223:21-cv-08523California2,787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 REBECCA AYRES, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08523-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

METLIFE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

12 Plaintiffs Rebecca L. Ayres, Vanessiah Ayres, and Anthony R. Durgans, proceeding without being represented by an attorney, filed a “Complaint for Reopening Case” against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiffs challenge the result in Metropolitan Life v. Ayres, et al., 4:99-cv-04323-SBA, which was filed in this District in 1999. Plaintiffs seek an order determining that Metropolitan Life v. Ayres “be reopened under FRCP Rule 60(b) or establishing an independent action to relieve the Plaintiffs under FRCP 60(c).” (Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 41.) The matter is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 27.) The Court held a hearing to consider the motion on June 2, 2022. Plaintiffs did not appear. After carefully considering the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.