Evans

Evans v. Paypal, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20225:22-cv-00248California3,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 LENA EVANS, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00248-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

PAYPAL, INC., [Re: ECF No. 20] Defendant.

12 In this case, Plaintiffs seek to represent a class of individuals whose accounts with Defendant PayPal, Inc. were frozen after PayPal alleged that the account holders had violated PayPal’s User Agreement or Acceptable Use Policies. If PayPal finds an alleged violation of those policies, PayPal allegedly seizes all the funds in the account as liquidated damages. Plaintiffs bring nine claims challenging this practice. Now before the Court is PayPal’s motion to compel arbitration. See ECF No. 20 (“MTC”); see also ECF No. 36 (“Reply”). PayPal argues that its User Agreement contains an arbitration agreement and class action waiver that covers all of the claims asserted in this lawsuit. Plaintiffs oppose the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.