PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JH KELLY, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-05381-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER ON DAUBERT MOTIONS v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 203, 204, 206, 207, 208, 209,

AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., 210 Defendant.

12 Before the Court are various motions to exclude expert opinions and testimony brought by both JH Kelly LLC (“JH Kelly”) and Defendant and Counter-Claimant AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (“AECOM”). Considering the significant number of disputes both parties have raised in this case generally and in these motions specifically, the Court will endeavor to provide succinct rulings on these motions as described below. The general theme is that the parties’ motions mostly function as previews of their cross-examinations, and are largely based on issues that go to the weight the jury should assign the expert testimony instead of whether it is admissible. Most of them are accordingly denied. I. BACKGROUND This construction dispute…