Kazda
Kazda v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHALA KAZDA, Case No. 19-cv-02512-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 100 Defendant.
12 Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) filed a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of my Order granting class certification. See Dkt. Nos. 99, 100. Having reviewed the motion, it is DENIED. Under Civil Local Rule 7-9(b), in seeking the court’s leave to file a motion for reconsideration, a party must show one of the following:
18 (1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the court before entry of the interlocutory order for which reconsideration is sought. The party also must show that in the exercise of reasonable diligence the party applying for reconsideration did not know such fact or law at the time of the interlocutory order; or 21…