Mack

Mack v. San Mateo County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20224:22-cv-00775California580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAJOR MACK,

Case No. 22-cv-00775-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE 9 SAN MATEO COUNTY, et al., 10 Defendants.

Plaintiff, an inmate at Maguire Correctional Facility, filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 25, 2022, the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint and ordered him to show cause within twenty-eight days why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Dkt. 8 at 2-3. Plaintiff was warned that the “[f]ailure to reply will result in dismissal without prejudice.” Id. at 3. The twenty-eight-day deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file a timely response to the order to show cause. As Plaintiff has not shown that he exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing suit, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.