Prasad
Prasad v. County of San Mateo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN PRASAD, Case No. 22-cv-00975-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND REQUEST
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., TO REOPEN; DIRECTIONS TO
CLERK
Defendants. 11 Re: ECF No. 8 12 On or about February 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. That same day, the Clerk of the Court informed Plaintiff that this action was deficient because Plaintiff had not paid the filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was instructed to respond within twenty-eight days of the date of this order. Id. Plaintiff did not respond to this notice. On May 26, 2022, the Court dismissed this action for failure to file an in forma pauperis application without prejudice to filing a motion to reopen the action accompanied by either the filing fee or an in forma pauperis application on the proper form with the required…