Redd

Redd v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20224:21-cv-08913California514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEPHEN M REDD, Case No. 21-cv-08913-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO

v. TUNC EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING

RON BROOMFIELD, et al., REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. 11 Re: ECF Nos. 38, 40

Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 19, 2022, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend because the complaint suffered from numerous deficiencies, including a failure to link any named defendant to a constitutional violation, a failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)’s requirement of a short and plain statement of the legal claims, and because the complaint violated Fed. R. Civ. P. 20. ECF No. 36. Now pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his amended complaint, ECF No. 38, and his request that the Court add to his amended complaint two requests…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.