Jones

Jones v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20223:20-cv-08710California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRETT “EEON” JONES, Case No. 20-cv-08710-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REOPENING ACTION;

v.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

UNITED STATES, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants.

12 After petitioner Bret “Eeon” Jones filed an “affidavit,” the Clerk sent him notices directing him to file a petition on this Court’s form, and to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (Dkt. Nos. 2 and 3.) When Jones did not comply with the Clerk’s Notices, the action was dismissed. (Dkt. No. 8.) Jones since has filed a petition, an IFP application, and a motion for reconsideration, which the Court construes as a motion to reopen. (Dkt. Nos. 10, 11 and 13.) The motion to reopen is GRANTED, and the action is REOPENED. The Clerk shall modify the docket to reflect that the action is reopened. The judgment and the order of dismissal are VACATED. The handwritten petition is difficult to follow and it does not appear on this Court’s form. Accordingly, it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.