Prasad

Prasad v. County of San Mateo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20224:22-cv-02720California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN B. PRASAD, Case No. 22-cv-02720-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

v. TIME; GRANTING REQUEST FOR

FORMS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., Re: ECF No. 5 Defendants.

12 On or about May 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. That same day, the Clerk of the Court informed Plaintiff that this action was deficient because Plaintiff had not paid the filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was instructed to respond within twenty-eight days of the date of this order. Id. Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file his in forma pauperis application, stating that San Mateo Sheriff County’s Office has lost the application that he had prepared for the Court, and that he has been unable to obtain the updated version of the in forma pauperis application. ECF No. 5. Good cause being shown, Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.