Saddozai

Saddozai v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20225:20-cv-07534California1,211 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIKEB SADDOZAI, Case No. 20-cv-07534 BLF (PR)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL OR

GUARDIAN AD LITEM

v.

14 M. B. ATCHLEY, et al.,

Defendants. (Docket No. 29)

17 Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison staff and officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), as well as the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Dkt. No. 1. On May 16, 2022, the Court dismissed the second amended complaint, Dkt. No. 28, with leave to amend for Plaintiff to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 36. Currently, Plaintiff’s third amended complaint is due by June 15, 2022. Id. The Court herein addresses Plaintiff’s latest motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 29. DISCUSSION A. Motion for Appointment of Counsel exceptional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.