San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20225:20-cv-00824California1,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER,

Lead Case No. 5:20-cv-00824-EJD Plaintiff, v. Consolidated with No. 5:20-cv-00826 EJD

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

Defendant. COMPLAINTS

RE: DKT. NO.

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER,

15 Plaintiff, v.

CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW,

Defendant.

Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Plaintiff”) initiated suits against Defendants City of Sunnyvale (“Sunnyvale”) and City of Mountain View (“Mountain View”) under the citizen suit enforcement provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”), to address allegedly unlawful discharges of bacteria pollution by these Cities. Plaintiff has brought a motion for leave to file second amended complaints. Dkt. No. 85. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.