Johnson v. Rosvin, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20223:21-cv-06760California1,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-06760-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO REQUIRE

v. PLAINTIFF TO ESTABLISH

STANDING

ROSVIN, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Scott Johnson brings this case under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. and California’s Unruh Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, to compel Defendant Rosvin, Inc. to provide accessible dining surfaces at Divino Ristorante, located at 968 Ralston Avenue, Belmont, California. Rosvin now moves the Court “to order plaintiff and his lawyer to establish that standing exists to bring this lawsuit.” ECF No. 26. Johnson opposes the motion. ECF No. 32. Federal courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party.” Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006). Johnson bears the burden of establishing federal subject matter 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.