Reeves
Reeves v. Niantic, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JARRETT REEVES, Case No. 21-cv-05883-VC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS
NIANTIC, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 28, 29 Defendant.
The motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The request for judicial notice is denied as moot because the Court did not consider any of the attached documents. 1. Reeves has stated a UCL claim for unlawful and unfair practices. See I.B. ex rel. Fife v. Facebook, Inc., 905 F. Supp. 2d 989, 1010–11 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (discussing unfair business practices). In California, a person may disaffirm a contract made while they were a minor at any time before they reach the age of majority (18) or “within a reasonable time afterwards.” Cal. Fam. Code § 6710. Reeves plausibly alleges that Niantic has violated this statute. Shortly after his 18th birthday, Reeves filed this lawsuit against Niantic, disaffirming several purchases of PokeCoins he made before he turned 18. But according to the complaint, Niantic has not refunded his purchases. Reeves has not, however, stated a UCL claim based in fraud because…